You are looking at a read-only demo. Everything here is fictional and the AI is simulated. You can read every page and ask the assistant questions, but nothing can be changed.Sign in with an access code to try the full workflow →
ICH Q9 alignment

How risk is scored, and how much formality each score requires.

ICH Q9 is the international guideline on quality risk management. Two ideas from it are built into this platform as fixed rules: risk is judged on defined scales, and the formality of the response must match the risk. The AI proposes the inputs. These rules do the arithmetic and decide who has to look.

What this page is, and is not. It shows how this platform applies those two ideas, with live counts from the demo data. It is not a statement that the platform is compliant. The wording of the mapping to the guideline is a proposal to be reviewed by a qualified GxP professional.
14
assessments scored
14
with formality that matches the risk
0
below the formality their risk requires, sent to a person
75%
AI confidence needed to clear an item without a person

1. The score: three scales multiplied

Each item gets a severity (how bad if it goes wrong), an occurrence (how likely) and a detection (how likely we are to miss it), each from 1 to 4. Multiplied together they give the risk priority number, the RPN, from 1 to 64. The RPN falls into one of four risk levels:

Risk levelRPNWho has to lookItems now
Level 11 to 7Automated rule checks. No person needed if nothing else is unusual.4
Level 28 to 15The AI reviews it and it is logged. A person only if something is unusual.4
Level 316 to 23A person must look. If escalated, the QA head signs.3
Level 424 or moreA person must look. If escalated, the QA head signs and then an executive signs.3

2. The formality: three more factors

Separately, uncertainty (how much is unknown), importance (how much it matters to the decision) and complexity are each scored from 0 to 2. Added together they give the formality grade, from A (least formal) to D (most formal): the more uncertain, important and complex, the more formal the response must be.

GradeThe three factors add up toItems now
A0 to 14
B2 to 34
C4 to 53
D63

3. The rule that joins them: formality must match the risk

A higher risk level demands a more formal grade. The least formal grade each level may have is level 1: A, level 2: B, level 3: C, level 4: D. An item below that line is marked below the required formality, which always sends it to a person. The AI cannot override this.

Formality ↓ / risk level →
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Grade A
A2
0
below required
A3
0
below required
A4
0
below required
Grade B
B1
0
B3
0
below required
B4
0
below required
Grade C
C1
0
C2
0
C4
0
below required
Grade D
D1
0
D2
0
D3
0

formality matches the risk below the formality required. The number in each box is how many live assessments sit there.

4. What each result sets in motion

  • Levels 1 and 2: the AI may clear the item on its own, if its confidence is at least 75%, its grade matches the risk, and the Assurance Layer passes it. Every clearance is logged and a person can challenge it.
  • Level 3: a person must look. If they escalate it, the QA head signs.
  • Level 4: a person must look. If they escalate it, the QA head signs first and an executive signs second.
  • Whatever the level: low confidence, a grade below the required formality, an AI recommendation to review or escalate, or a failed Assurance check all send the item to a person. The AI can add reasons for a person to look. It can never remove one.

See the Assurance Layer for the checks, and how a record is handled for the whole path.