AiVACO · Inspection evidence pack

ASM-0014 — Grade B cleanroom: two non-viable particle excursions

Generated 2026-10-26 14:50:41 UTC · assembled from the live audit trail, not a template

Audit trail integrity: Intact. 68 records verified at generation time.

1. Record

Source systemLIMS · ENV-26-0933
Process stageManufacturing
SummaryParticle counts exceeded the action limit twice in one shift in the filling suite.
Current dispositionFlagged, waiting for the auditor

2. AI proposal and the rules applied

The AI proposes the factors below. The grade and the routing are computed by fixed rules (ICH Q9(R1)), never by the AI.

Severity4 of 4
Occurrence3 of 4
Detection2 of 4
Uncertainty2 of 2
Importance2 of 2
Complexity2 of 2
RPN (S × O × D)24
Computed gradeD4 — risk level 4, formality D (commensurate with risk)
AI confidence83%, recommendation: escalate (engine: simulated)
AI reasoningRepeated excursions in a Grade B area adjacent to aseptic filling threaten sterility assurance and need an immediate human decision.
RoutingLevel 3 — a human was required because:
  • Risk level 4 (RPN 24) is at or above the QA threshold
  • The AI recommends escalation

Assurance Layer check on the AI proposal

Fixed rule set version 1.0.0, checked on 2026-10-26. Overall: passed.

RuleResultDetail
P1 · Scores are on the defined scalesPassedAll six scores are whole numbers inside their scales.
P2 · Confidence is a real percentagePassedConfidence is 83%.
P3 · Recommendation is one the platform allowsPassedThe recommendation is “escalate”.
P4 · A reason is givenPassedA reason is given.
P5 · It rests on documents that are in force todayPassedAll 2 named control(s) have a version in force.
P6 · Supporting text was foundPassed2 supporting passage(s) found.
P7 · Formality matches the riskPassedGrade D4 is formal enough for the risk.
P8 · The AI did not try to lower the barPassedThe AI’s recommendation does not try to go below what the fixed rules require.

3. Controls and the regulations they satisfy

Company controlRegulation / guideline
SOP-QC-021 Environmental MonitoringEU GMP Annex 1 · ICH Q9(R1)
SOP-MFG-031 Aseptic FillingEU GMP Annex 1 · ICH Q9(R1)

4. Controlled documents relied on

SOP-QC-021 v4.0 §5.3 · Environmental Monitoring — Grade B and aseptic areas
Repeated action-limit excursions in a Grade B area adjacent to aseptic filling require immediate notification of Quality Assurance and an assessment of the impact on sterility assurance before filling continues.
SOP-QC-021 v4.0 §5.2 · Environmental Monitoring — Alert and action limits
Each classified area has alert and action limits for viable and non-viable monitoring. A result above an alert limit is trended; a result above an action limit starts an investigation the same day.

5. Signature

No signature on this assessment.

6. Audit trail for this record

Each record is hash-chained to the one before it and cannot be edited or deleted. Record numbers refer to the platform-wide trail.

#Time (UTC)WhoEventHash
632026-10-26 12:55:18 UTCconnector.limsRecord ENV-26-0933 pulled from LIMS273c600f1df1…
642026-10-26 12:55:19 UTCai.simulatedAI proposed a grade of D4 (RPN 24, 83% confident) — Level 36d856ac4e40c…
652026-10-26 12:55:19 UTCassuranceAssurance Layer (rules v1.0.0) checked the AI proposal: passed all 8 checksfb9684f799f6…
662026-10-26 12:55:19 UTCsystemFlagged for a human: Risk level 4 (RPN 24) is at or above the QA threshold; The AI recommends escalation08dca67f35ca…